Hello guys, Welcome to Africa's Largest Video Search Engine, and you are watching logical framework vs theory of change. and this video is uploaded by M&E Guru at 2023-10-14T05:35:29-07:00. We are just promoting this video only for entertainment and educational purpose only. I hop you like our Video Search Engine. [lc5jbVqUfEg]
| Name | logical framework vs theory of change |
| Video Uploader | Video From M&E Guru |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 14-10-2023 12:35:29 |
| Video Discription | logical framework vs theory of change Although, the Logical Framework and Theory of Change are both planning and evaluation tools used in project and program management, they have some distinct approaches and characteristics: Logical Framework or the LogFrame is a structured matrix or table that outlines project components, objectives, indicators, means of verification, and assumptions. It focuses primarily on the project's outputs, activities, and outcomes, with a linear and systematic approach. The LogFrame typically consists of four main levels: inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes and is arranged in a linear and hierarchical structure to show the cause-and-effect relationship. The Logical framework is specific and concrete in detailing the steps and expected results of a project, so it is commonly used in project design and monitoring by international organizations. On the other hand the Theory of Change is a narrative or graphical representation that explains the underlying assumptions, logic, and pathways through which a project or program is expected to bring about change. It places a strong emphasis on understanding the context and the "why" behind a project. It aims to provide a deeper and more holistic understanding of the change process. ToC is more flexible and adaptable to complex and dynamic situations. It recognizes that social change is often nonlinear and that projects need to adjust to evolving conditions. It is used for program planning, evaluation, and learning and helps stakeholders make explicit assumptions and test the underlying theories about how change will occur. The theory of change considers a broader range of factors, stakeholders, and external influences that can affect the success of a project, so developing a Theory of Change is often a participatory process involving various stakeholders, which can foster a shared understanding and collaboration. In summary, the key difference between a Logical Framework and a Theory of Change is the level of detail and flexibility. The Logical Framework is more detailed, linear, and structured, making it suitable for well-defined project. In contrast, a Theory of Change provides a more holistic, flexible, and context-specific view of how change is expected to happen and is more suitable for complex and adaptive projects. Depending on the nature of the project, organizations may choose to use one or both of these tools in their planning and evaluation processes. [lc5jbVqUfEg] |
| Category | Education |
| Tags | logical framework vs theory of chage | theory of chage | logical framework | lfa | LFA | TOC | toc | monitoring and evaluation | evaluation | project evaluation | project montoring |
